Seasonal weather probability · Poland

Probability,
not forecasts.

KLIMAT-P gives operations planners, agronomists, and energy operators a probabilistic view of the coming months, grounded in real IMGW-PIB data and updated daily.

Example output - Mazowsze · Beta
Live model
Temperature Anomaly
vs. 1991–2020 norm
72%↑ Rising
Heat Wave Window
≥5 days above 30°C
67%↑ Rising
Drought Risk
Soil moisture deficit
54%↑ Rising
Precipitation Deficit
Below seasonal norm
48%→ Stable
Late Frost Risk
After 15 May
18%→ Stable
River Flood Risk
Level anomaly >+30%
22%↓ Falling
Each indicator updates when new IMGW data arrives. Probabilities shift, not replace, as conditions evolve.
62
IMGW synoptic stations
6
Probability indicators
30+
Years of baseline data
Daily
Model update cadence
Brier
Verified forecast scoring

Six indicators. One region. Updated daily.

Every card shows the current probability, how it changed, and what is driving the shift. Not a forecast, a living probability distribution.

Temperature Anomaly
vs. 1991–2020 norm
↑ Rising
72%
Computed from live IMGW-PIB station data against 1991–2020 climatological baseline. Updates with each new synoptic cycle.
Heat Wave Window
≥5 days above 30°C
↑ Rising
67%
Driven by blocking high-pressure pattern. Signal strengthened after recent station anomalies crossed +7°C above July norm.
Drought Risk
Soil moisture deficit
↑ Rising
54%
Compound signal: elevated temperatures combined with positive NAO suppressing Atlantic moisture advection over central Poland.
Precipitation Deficit
Below seasonal norm
→ Stable
48%
Directional signal based on temperature anomaly and NAO state. Monthly totals accumulate over the synoptic cycle.
Late Frost Risk
After 15 May
→ Stable
18%
Near zero in summer months. Warm air mass dominance firmly established across the Mazowsze region.
River Flood Risk
Level anomaly >+30%
↓ Falling
22%
Suppressed by dry-warm pattern. Positive NAO and warm anomaly reduce precipitation probability across the basin.
Example output - beta model. Values shown are from a live model run, not constructed. The dashboard updates with each IMGW synoptic cycle. Open the live dashboard →

Different from every weather product you use

Honest about uncertainty

Every probability comes with a confidence rating and a stated driver. When the model is uncertain, it says so, rather than showing a precise number that implies false confidence.

Dynamic, not a snapshot

The probability that a summer will be above normal is not fixed in April. It shifts as conditions evolve. KLIMAT-P shows you how it is shifting and why, updated with each new data cycle.

Built for planning horizons

Most weather products optimise for 48-hour precision. KLIMAT-P is built for 4–12 week operational planning horizons, where the only honest answer is probabilistic.

Built for people weather actually costs money

Agriculture
Frost risk windows, harvest timing, spray day probability.
Logistics
Workability forecasts, delay-risk scoring for planning.
Energy
Wind and solar output probability over a seasonal horizon.
Events
Rain-window probability for outdoor planning weeks ahead.
Public sector
Drought and flood early-warning signals for municipalities.
The model

Bayesian, real-data, independently verified.

KLIMAT-P does not generate synthetic data or simulate weather. It reads real station observations, compares them to a 30-year climatological baseline, and updates probability estimates using Bayesian inference, the same methodology used in research-grade seasonal forecasting.

Every output is verified against what actually occurred, using Brier Score, the standard metric for probabilistic forecast accuracy. The verification record is visible inside the platform.

Data source
IMGW-PIB synoptic network, 62 Polish stations
Climate signals
NAO, AO, ENSO (NOAA CPC), updated monthly
Baseline
1991–2020 IMGW climatological normals (WMO standard)
Verification
Brier Score, computed weekly against actual outcomes
Cadence
Model recomputes daily, output visible in dashboard

Every prediction gets checked.

A probability only means something if it's honest. Each week, KLIMAT-P compares what it predicted against what actually happened at IMGW-PIB stations, and scores the result using Brier methodology, the standard measure of probabilistic forecast accuracy. Nothing is graded after the fact, and nothing is adjusted to look better. The full verification record is visible inside the platform, for anyone to check.

Weekly
Scored automatically
Public
Visible in the dashboard
Unedited
No retroactive adjustment
Data sources
IMGW-PIB
Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Poland
NOAA CPC
Climate Prediction Center, USA
WMO
World Meteorological Organization
Full sources list →